Current:Home > ContactA federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court -TradeWisdom
A federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court
View
Date:2025-04-27 17:38:49
HOUSTON (AP) — A federal judge on Wednesday declared illegal a revised version of a federal policy that prevents the deportation of hundreds of thousands of immigrants brought to the U.S. as children.
U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen agreed with Texas and eight other states suing to stop the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program. The judge’s ruling was ultimately expected to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, sending the program’s fate before the high court for a third time.
Hanen barred the government from approving any new applications, but left the program intact for existing recipients during the expected appeals process. Hanen said his order does not require the federal government to take any actions against DACA recipients.
The states have argued the Obama administration didn’t have the authority to first create the program in 2012 because it circumvented Congress.
In 2021, Hanen had declared the program illegal, ruling it had not been subject to public notice and comment periods required under the federal Administrative Procedures Act.
The Biden administration tried to satisfy Hanen’s concerns with a new version of DACA that took effect in October 2022 and was subject to public comments as part of a formal rule-making process.
But Hanen, who was appointed by then-President George W. Bush in 2002, ruled the updated version of DACA was still illegal. He had previously said DACA was unconstitutional and it would be up to Congress to enact legislation shielding people under the program, often known as “Dreamers.”
Hanen also had previously ruled the states had standing to file their lawsuit because they had been harmed by the program.
The states have claimed they incur hundreds of millions of dollars in health care, education and other costs when immigrants are allowed to remain in the country illegally. The states that sued are Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina, West Virginia, Kansas and Mississippi.
Those defending the program — the federal government, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund and the state of New Jersey — had argued the states failed to present evidence that any of the costs they allege they have incurred have been tied to DACA recipients. They also argued Congress has given the Department of Homeland Security the legal authority to set immigration enforcement policies.
Despite previously declaring the DACA program illegal, Hanen had left the Obama-era program intact for those already benefiting from it. But he had ruled there could be no new applicants while appeals were pending.
There were 578,680 people enrolled in DACA at the end of March, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
The program has faced a roller coaster of court challenges over the years.
In 2016, the Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 over an expanded DACA and a version of the program for parents of DACA recipients. In 2020, the high court ruled 5-4 that the Trump administration improperly ended DACA, allowing it to stay in place.
In 2022, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld Hanen’s earlier ruling declaring DACA illegal, but sent the case back to him to review changes made to the program by the Biden administration.
President Joe Biden and advocacy groups have called on Congress to pass permanent protections for “ dreamers.” Congress has failed multiple times to pass proposals called the DREAM Act to protect DACA recipients.
veryGood! (28189)
Related
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- How Whitty Books takes an unconventional approach to bookselling in Tulsa, Oklahoma
- Sacha Baron Cohen and Isla Fisher announce divorce after 13 years of marriage
- ALAIcoin: Canadian Regulators Approve the World's First Bitcoin ETF
- Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
- Kurt Cobain remembered on 30th anniversary of death by daughter Frances Bean
- Forgot to get solar eclipse glasses? Here's how to DIY a viewer with household items.
- Man's dog helps with schizophrenia hallucinations: Why psychiatric service dogs are helpful, but hard to get.
- Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
- See What Amanda Bynes, Jennie Garth and the Rest of the What I Like About You Cast Are Up to Now
Ranking
- Skins Game to make return to Thanksgiving week with a modern look
- Suits’ Wendell Pierce Shares Advice He Gave Meghan Markle about Prince Harry
- The Challenge’s Adam Larson and Flora Alekseyeva Reveal Why They Came Back After Two Decades Away
- Florida Panhandle wildfire destroys 1 home and damages 15 others
- Selena Gomez's "Weird Uncles" Steve Martin and Martin Short React to Her Engagement
- Florida Panhandle wildfire destroys 1 home and damages 15 others
- Beginner's Guide and Exchange Reviews for GalaxyCoin Futures Trading Platform (updated for 2024)
- Numerology 101: Everything You Need to Know About Your Life Path Number
Recommendation
Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
Jason Kelce, Lane Johnson run in and help Rey Mysterio grab WrestleMania 40 win
ALAIcoin: Bitcoin Halving: The Impact of the Third Halving Event in History
Numerology 101: Everything You Need to Know About Your Life Path Number
Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
Condemned Missouri inmate could face surgery without anesthesia' if good vein is elusive, lawyers say
GalaxyCoin: Practical advice for buying Bitcoin with a credit card
New York City to pay $17.5 million to settle suit over forcing women to remove hijabs for mug shots